Russia‑Taliban Pact, Israel’s Gaza Endgame, Hungary ICC Exit, Africa Drone Surge

Watch the Episode

Video originally published on May 12, 2025.

A wave of strategic recalibrations is reshaping the global security map. In the spring of 2025, Moscow stripped the Taliban of its terrorist label, Israel unveiled a plan to permanently occupy Gaza, Budapest announced a withdrawal from the International Criminal Court, and unmanned aircraft are redefining battlefields across Africa. Together, these developments signal a convergence of realpolitik, legal contestation, and technological disruption that will reverberate through regional power balances and humanitarian landscapes for months to come.

Key Takeaways

Russia’s Supreme Court removed the Taliban from its terrorist list, opening the door for formal diplomatic ties and signaling a strategic pivot toward Central Asia and counter‑terrorism cooperation.
Israel’s security cabinet approved Operation Gideon’s Chariots, a plan to permanently occupy Gaza, dismantle Hamas, and relocate or displace roughly two million Palestinians, with strict humanitarian controls.
Hungary’s decision to withdraw from the International Criminal Court after an arrest warrant for Netanyahu marks the first EU exit from the ICC, challenging the court’s authority and raising questions about international law.
Drone warfare has proliferated across Africa, with state and non‑state actors like ISWAP, Al Shabaab, and the Sudanese Armed Forces using drones for attacks, causing widespread civilian casualties.
Russia’s engagement with the Taliban includes potential exploitation of Afghanistan’s mineral resources, raising concerns that extraction benefits Russia more than the Afghan population.
Israel’s plan involves private companies delivering aid under IDF control, faces domestic opposition, logistical hurdles, and could set a precedent for military governance of humanitarian zones.

Moscow’s Strategic Realignment with the Taliban

On 17 April 2025 Russia’s Supreme Court removed the Taliban’s designation as a terrorist organization, a move announced by the Kremlin’s special envoy for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov. The ruling clears the path for formal diplomatic relations, a stark reversal of the hostility that characterized the 1990s when the Taliban recognised Chechnya’s independence and supported anti‑Russian militants. After the United States’ 2021 withdrawal, Russia kept its embassy open in Kabul, accredited a Taliban diplomat in March 2022, and invited a Taliban delegation to the Saint Petersburg economic forum in June 2022. Provisional trade agreements were signed in September 2022, and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met his Taliban counterpart Amir Khan Muttaqi in October 2024. The Kremlin frames the rapprochement as a pragmatic response to deteriorating US‑Russia ties and a chance to counter the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISK), which has carried out attacks in Moscow and Kabul. Putin’s July 2024 comment that the Taliban are “allies in the fight against terrorism” underscores the shared interest in curbing ISK, which claimed 145 lives in a Moscow concert hall attack in March 2024 and was behind the 2021 Kabul airport bombing. Yet analysts cited by Brookings warn that ISK may act as a “spoiler,” seeking to sour Taliban‑Russia relations to deepen Afghanistan’s economic woes and fuel its own insurgency. Beyond security, Moscow eyes Afghanistan’s mineral wealth, estimated at roughly $1 trillion. In December, the Russian Business Centre in Afghanistan offered to conduct a detailed survey of the country’s critical minerals, echoing Russia’s pattern of exploiting resource‑rich but fragile states, as seen in the Sahel. For the Taliban, the partnership promises relief from diplomatic isolation and a potential boost to a faltering economy plagued by suspended US aid, currency depreciation, and trade disruptions, as reported by ReliefWeb. While the Supreme Court decision does not constitute formal recognition, its symbolic weight signals a shift that could expand Russia’s influence in Central Asia, challenge NATO’s regional posture, and create a new axis of cooperation that may complicate counter‑terrorism efforts across the former Soviet space.

Israel’s ‘Endgame’ Plan for Gaza

On 5 May 2025 Israel’s security cabinet, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, approved a comprehensive operation to dismantle Hamas and permanently occupy the Gaza Strip. Codenamed Operation Gideon’s Chariots, the plan calls for four to five divisions of armored and infantry units to seize the majority of Gaza, flatten all remaining structures, and destroy tunnel networks. Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich emphasized that the occupation would be irreversible, even if Hamas released hostages. The strategy envisions the displacement of roughly two million Palestinians to a cleared‑out area of the former city of Rafah, where large compounds are under construction to serve as a “humanitarian zone.” Aid would be supplied by private companies and distributed by the IDF, with facial‑recognition technology used to identify recipients. The UN and other aid agencies have refused to participate, citing the manipulation of humanitarian assistance as an unacceptable pressure tactic. Planned food deliveries would drop from 500 trucks per day before the war to about 60 trucks per day under the new scheme. Israel has already cordoned off 70 percent of the pre‑war Gaza territory with evacuation orders, treating civilians in non‑evacuated zones as combatants. Humanitarian aid has been largely cut off, prompting the Netherlands to accuse Israel of breaching international humanitarian law. Community kitchens are shutting down, malnutrition is rising, and law‑and‑order has collapsed, with Hamas reportedly executing alleged looters. The operation faces internal resistance: polling indicates up to 70 percent of Israelis oppose the plan, preferring a negotiated settlement. Reservists called up for the offensive may see as many as half refuse to report for duty after three hundred days of combat since October 2023. Hamas has rejected any ceasefire, stating that the plan “sacrifices” the remaining hostages. Internationally, the United States appears disengaged, focusing on Iran and Ukraine, while former President Donald Trump’s scheduled visit to Israel this month suggests tacit U.S. support. If launched, the campaign could take weeks to months to complete, depending on the speed of displacement and construction in Rafah. Its execution would mark the culmination of Israel’s stated “endgame” in Gaza, reshaping the humanitarian and geopolitical landscape of the Middle East.

Hungary’s Withdrawal from the International Criminal Court

In early April 2025 Hungary announced its intention to leave the International Criminal Court (ICC), a decision triggered by the court’s November 2024 arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The warrant, issued for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza conflict, also named former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and Hamas commander Ibrahim Al Masri (deceased). Netanyahu denounced the warrant as a “dark day for humanity.” Prime Minister Viktor Orban welcomed Netanyahu to Budapest for a four‑day state visit, then used the occasion to declare the ICC a “political court” and announced Hungary’s withdrawal, making it the first European nation to exit the tribunal. The move follows earlier exits by Burundi and the Philippines, while major powers such as the United States, China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, and Indonesia have never joined. Hungary’s departure revives longstanding criticism of the ICC’s effectiveness. Past cases include the 2009 arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar Al‑Bashir, who traveled freely despite the warrant, and the 2023 warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, which Russia ignored after rescinding its signature to the Rome Statute. Critics argue the court disproportionately targets leaders from weaker states, a charge echoed by African leaders who have accused the ICC of Western imperialism. Orban’s decision also reflects domestic legal controversies. Hungary faced international backlash for releasing convicted Azerbaijani officer Ramil Safarov to Azerbaijan in 2012, and for the 2023 parliamentary immunity granted to Italian activist Ilaria Salis, which shielded her from prosecution. These episodes have been cited as evidence of Hungary’s “authoritarian” trajectory, a narrative reinforced by Foreign Policy’s description of the country as a “dictatorship” in late 2024. The ICC has opened non‑compliance proceedings against Hungary for failing to arrest Netanyahu, with a deadline of 23 May to submit a defence. Whether the withdrawal will proceed smoothly or trigger further diplomatic isolation remains uncertain, but it underscores the fragility of global criminal justice mechanisms when powerful states choose to disengage.

The Drone Revolution Across Africa

Unmanned aerial systems have become a defining feature of African conflicts, reshaping battlefields from Sudan to Ethiopia. On 31 July 2024, a video captured Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) cadets marching when a drone struck the base, an attack that General Abdel Fattah al‑Burhan survived. Later, on Christmas Eve 2024, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) launched four armed drones with grenades against a Nigerian military base, injuring five soldiers and broadcasting the strike as propaganda. Drone use in Africa dates back to 2011, when the United States targeted an Al Shabaab convoy in Somalia. Since then, the technology has proliferated rapidly. The Institute for Security Studies warned in 2023 that ISWAP was on the cusp of weaponising drones previously used only for surveillance. Acquisition is facilitated by smuggling routes, arms‑trafficking networks, and knowledge transfer from international terror partners. Former ISWAP members describe a supply chain that runs from Iran, through Houthi intermediaries, to Al Shabaab and Islamic State in Somalia. State actors also field drones. In Sudan, Russia supplied the Wagner‑linked Rapid Support Forces (RSF) with drones in early 2023, then switched support to the SAF in spring 2024, exchanging aid for a promised Red Sea naval base. The United Arab Emirates has deployed Chinese‑made Wing Loong II drones, capable of 4,000 km range, for intelligence, surveillance, and occasional strikes. The RSF’s FH‑95 drone achieved a symbolic victory in March 2024 by downing a Russian Su‑224 bomber used by the SAF. Conversely, the SAF relies on Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones, which have been credited with reversing early setbacks and supporting assaults on RSF‑held territory, including the recapture of parts of Khartoum. Civilian casualties have surged. An RSF drone strike on 26 April 2024 killed at least 11 people at a displaced‑people camp in River Nile state and knocked out the Atbara power station. Earlier, a drone attack on a hospital in El Fasher killed 67 patients and staff. In Ethiopia’s Amhara region, a drone strike on the market town of Zibst killed 51 civilians, while a strike on a camp in River Nile state killed 11. Ethiopian General Birhanu Jula dismissed claims of intentional targeting, stating “Drones were made for war! We purchased them for battle, not to parade them in the media.” The proliferation of cheap, commercially‑derived drones has lowered the barrier to precision warfare, allowing both governments and non‑state actors to conduct strikes with minimal risk to their own forces. While drones have proven decisive—such as in the Ethiopian conflict with Tigray where they prevented a potential defeat—the humanitarian cost raises profound ethical questions. As Africa stands at a crossroads, the manner in which regional powers, African institutions, and the international community regulate or resist this technology will shape the continent’s security environment for decades.

Related Coverage

FAQ

What is the central development in Russia‑Taliban Pact, Israel’s Gaza Endgame, Hungary ICC Exit, Africa Drone Surge?

A wave of strategic recalibrations is reshaping the global security map. Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-concerned-islamic-states-plans-destabilise-central-asia-report-2022-03-31/ Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/exclusive-afghan-taliban-sign-deal-russian-oil-products-gas-wheat-2022-09-27/ RadioFreeEurope: https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-court-ruling-ban-taliban-afghanistan-recognition/33388428.html Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/russia-afghanistan-relations-in-the-aftermath-of-the-moscow-attack/ The Soufan Center: https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-april-23/ Amnesty International: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/afghanistan/report-afghanistan/ https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly2exvx944o BBC News https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/reaction-icc-warrants-israeli-hamas-leaders-2024-11-21/ Reuters https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/03/world/hungary-withdraws-icc-intl/index.html CNN https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/22/hungary-asks-eu-strip-parliamentary-immunity-italian-mep-ilaria-salis The Guardian https://www.reuters.com/article/hungary-orban-idUSL5E8KDGBI20120918/ Reuters https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-02/05-01/09-1 ICC https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and ICC https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704y7gwr95o BBC News https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/german-fm-says-netanyahus-visit-to-hungary-is-bad-day-for-international-law/ The Times of Israel https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/12/06/hungary-viktor-orban-democracy-dictatorship-illiberalism-eu/ Foreign Policy https://apnews.com/article/hungary-icc-netanyahu-court-orban-413aa32cd85f2aaec65fdb6a4551ad33 Associated Press

What remains uncertain right now?

On 5 May 2025 Israel’s security cabinet, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, approved a comprehensive operation to dismantle Hamas and permanently occupy the Gaza Strip.

Why does this matter strategically?

On 17 April 2025 Russia’s Supreme Court removed the Taliban’s designation as a terrorist organization, a move announced by the Kremlin’s special envoy for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov.

What indicators should observers monitor next?

Unmanned aerial systems have become a defining feature of African conflicts, reshaping battlefields from Sudan to Ethiopia. However, what has analysts and Africa observers quaking in their boots is how quickly unmanned systems have spread, how easily militias and terror cells can buy or build them, and how often civilians bear the worst of the cost, even when the drones are in the hands of the government.

Sources

About the Author

Jackson Reed

Jackson Reed creates and presents analysis focused on military doctrine, strategic competition, and conflict dynamics.

About the Team →